Legal Opinion

State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Estes

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 29, 1968No. 20,686PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLewis, C. J.

The appellant filed a petition to transfer to the Supreme Court. In the Appellate Court opinion 233 N. E. *4772d 253, 142 Ind. App. —, the Appellate Court among other things said:

“Since we do not have the evidence before us we, on appeal, presume there was evidence to support the action of the trial court. The burden is upon appellant to demonstrate that none of the reasons given are valid and to affirmatively demonstrate an abuse of discretion by the trial court in the granting of the motion for a new trial. Griffith v. Matthew, supra, (1967), [141 Ind. App. 462], 229 N. E. 2d 657, 658, 11 Ind.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Griffith v. MathewIndiana Court of Appeals · 1967

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Landers v. McCOMB WINDOW & DOOR CO., INC.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1969
  2. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INS. CO. v. EstesIndiana Court of Appeals · 1968
  3. Moore v. Berry Refining Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1969
  4. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. EstesIndiana Court of Appeals · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API