Legal Opinion
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Estes
Indiana Supreme Court
Decided May 29, 1968No. 20,686PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLewis, C. J.
The appellant filed a petition to transfer to the Supreme Court. In the Appellate Court opinion 233 N. E. *4772d 253, 142 Ind. App. —, the Appellate Court among other things said:
“Since we do not have the evidence before us we, on appeal, presume there was evidence to support the action of the trial court. The burden is upon appellant to demonstrate that none of the reasons given are valid and to affirmatively demonstrate an abuse of discretion by the trial court in the granting of the motion for a new trial. Griffith v. Matthew, supra, (1967), [141 Ind. App. 462], 229 N. E. 2d 657, 658, 11 Ind.…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Griffith v. MathewIndiana Court of Appeals · 1967
3Cited by4 opinions
- Landers v. McCOMB WINDOW & DOOR CO., INC.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1969
- STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INS. CO. v. EstesIndiana Court of Appeals · 1968
- Moore v. Berry Refining Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1969
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. EstesIndiana Court of Appeals · 1968