Legal Opinion

In Re Huyler

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided July 13, 1945PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtIIehee, J.

Upon the representation that he is illegally confined in the state prison, petitioner I-Iuyler was granted a writ of habeas corpus under R. 8. 2:82-l, et seq.

The return made by the principal keeper of the prison sets forth that petitioner entered the prison on January 3d, 1940, under separate sentences on two convictions in the Passaic Quarter Sessions for “breaking, entering, larceny and receiving,” each for the maximum term of five years and the minimum term of three years, to run consecutively, or a sentence in the aggregate of six to ten years; that this was petitioner’s “third sentence”…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Worbetz v. GoodmanNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1957
  2. ESSEX CTY. WELFARE BD. v. HellamsNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1967
  3. State v. NewtonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1954
  4. State v. ChapmanNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1983
  5. Curtiss-Wright Corp. v. Passaic Valley Water CommissionNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1964

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API