Simmons v. Simmons
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Dissent
Dissenting Opinion by
Kenworthey, J.:
The facts and the history of the pertinent legislation and decisions are amply set forth in the opinion of the President Judge. But I am unable to agree with the construction of the Act of 1849 adopted by the majority. I think that construction disregards the phrase, “when a judgment has been or shall be regularly revived between the original parties,” and that the decisions relied upon do not compel the conclusion reached.
Under the Act of 1827, a revival of the judgment against the original debtor alone within the five-year period availed nothing as…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Armstrong's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1843
- First National Bank & Trust Co. v. MillerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
- Uhler v. MosesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1901
- Lyon ex rel. Conklin v. ClevelandSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1895
- Kefover v. HusteadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.