Legal Opinion · Dissent

Simmons v. Simmons

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 2, 1942No. Appeal, 9Published

1Dissent

Dissenting Opinion by

Kenworthey, J.:

The facts and the history of the pertinent legislation and decisions are amply set forth in the opinion of the President Judge. But I am unable to agree with the construction of the Act of 1849 adopted by the majority. I think that construction disregards the phrase, “when a judgment has been or shall be regularly revived between the original parties,” and that the decisions relied upon do not compel the conclusion reached.

Under the Act of 1827, a revival of the judgment against the original debtor alone within the five-year period availed nothing as…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Armstrong's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1843
  2. First National Bank & Trust Co. v. MillerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  3. Uhler v. MosesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1901
  4. Lyon ex rel. Conklin v. ClevelandSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1895
  5. Kefover v. HusteadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API