Edwards v. City of Tomball
Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partKem Thompson Frost, Justice
The trial court did not err in granting the plea to the jurisdiction as to the claims discussed in the majority opinion. But the majority does not address one of the appellant’s claims, and the trial court erred in dismissing that claim for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction.
The appellant seeks a declaratory judgment that the Ordinance is unenforceable.
Appellant Lady Edwards asserted a number of claims against appellee, The City of Tomball (hereinafter, the “City”) regarding City of Tomball Ordinance No. 2007-08 (hereinafter, the “Ordinance”) and Chapter 707 of the Texas Transportation Code…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- The City of El Paso v. Lilli M. HeinrichTexas Supreme Court · 2009
- In Re Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. LpTexas Supreme Court · 2007
- City of Elsa v. M.A.L.Texas Supreme Court · 2007
- Bolton v. SparksTexas Supreme Court · 1962
- Juliff Gardens v. Texas Commission on Environmental Quality, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2004
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.