Legal Opinion

People v. Durand

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 29, 1905No. Crim. No. 5PublishedCited by 2 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtChipman, P. J.

Defendant was convicted of the crime of assault with a deadly weapon. He appeals from the judgment on a bill of exceptions duly settled and allowed. There was no motion to instruct the jury to acquit when the prosecution rested, nor for a new trial, and there is in the record no exception taken to any ruling or decision of the court. The court instructed the jury as follows: "That in order to convict the defendant of the crime charged in the complaint, it must appear from the evidence, beyond a reasonable doubt, that the alleged assault was made with a deadly weapon, and that it is incumbent…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. WardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
  2. People ex rel. Smith v. KeyserCalifornia Supreme Court · 1878
  3. Walker v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. People v. FrankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1905
  2. People v. SilversCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1907

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API