People v. Durand
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtChipman, P. J.
Defendant was convicted of the crime of assault with a deadly weapon. He appeals from the judgment on a bill of exceptions duly settled and allowed. There was no motion to instruct the jury to acquit when the prosecution rested, nor for a new trial, and there is in the record no exception taken to any ruling or decision of the court. The court instructed the jury as follows: "That in order to convict the defendant of the crime charged in the complaint, it must appear from the evidence, beyond a reasonable doubt, that the alleged assault was made with a deadly weapon, and that it is incumbent…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- People v. WardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
- People ex rel. Smith v. KeyserCalifornia Supreme Court · 1878
- Walker v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
3Cited by2 opinions
- People v. FrankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1905
- People v. SilversCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1907