Eads v. Consolidated Rail Corp.
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the CourtJustice McBRIDE
In this permissive interlocutory appeal pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 306, the defendant, Consolidated Rail Corporation (Conrail), a Pennsylvania corporation, contends it was an abuse of discretion for the circuit court of Cook County to deny its motion to dismiss the Indiana plaintiffs negligence action on the basis of forum non conveniens before a retrial on the action commences in this jurisdiction. 166 Ill. 2d R. 306.
The accident at issue occurred in Indiana at approximately 3:37 p.m. on Saturday, September 20, 1997, when plaintiff Tracie D. Eads was riding in the front passenger seat of…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Gulf Oil Corp. v. GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Bland v. Norfolk & Western Railway Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1987
- Griffith v. Mitsubishi Aircraft International, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1990
- Lowe v. Norfolk & Western Railway Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1984
- Vinson v. AllstateIllinois Supreme Court · 1991
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Fennell v. Illinois Central R.R. Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 2013
- Brdar v. Cottrell, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2007
- Erwin Ex Rel. Erwin v. Motorola, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2011
- Quaid v. Baxter Healthcare Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2009
- Schuster v. RichardsAppellate Court of Illinois · 2018
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.