Legal Opinion

Eads v. Consolidated Rail Corp.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided March 20, 2006No. 1-05-1895PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McBRIDE

In this permissive interlocutory appeal pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 306, the defendant, Consolidated Rail Corporation (Conrail), a Pennsylvania corporation, contends it was an abuse of discretion for the circuit court of Cook County to deny its motion to dismiss the Indiana plaintiffs negligence action on the basis of forum non conveniens before a retrial on the action commences in this jurisdiction. 166 Ill. 2d R. 306.

The accident at issue occurred in Indiana at approximately 3:37 p.m. on Saturday, September 20, 1997, when plaintiff Tracie D. Eads was riding in the front passenger seat of…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Gulf Oil Corp. v. GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Bland v. Norfolk & Western Railway Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Griffith v. Mitsubishi Aircraft International, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Lowe v. Norfolk & Western Railway Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1984
  5. Vinson v. AllstateIllinois Supreme Court · 1991

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Fennell v. Illinois Central R.R. Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Brdar v. Cottrell, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2007
  3. Erwin Ex Rel. Erwin v. Motorola, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2011
  4. Quaid v. Baxter Healthcare Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2009
  5. Schuster v. RichardsAppellate Court of Illinois · 2018

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API