Legal Opinion

Kannry v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided December 20, 2019No. 19-494Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

19-494 Kannry v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT SUMMARY ORDER RULINGS BY SUMMARY ORDER DO NOT HAVE PRECEDENTIAL EFFECT. CITATION TO A SUMMARY ORDER FILED ON OR AFTER JANUARY 1, 2007, IS PERMITTED AND IS GOVERNED BY FEDERAL RULE OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE 32.1 AND THIS COURT=S LOCAL RULE 32.1.1. WHEN CITING A SUMMARY ORDER IN A DOCUMENT FILED WITH THIS COURT, A PARTY MUST CITE EITHER THE FEDERAL APPENDIX OR AN ELECTRONIC DATABASE (WITH THE NOTATION ASUMMARY ORDER@). A PARTY CITING TO A SUMMARY ORDER MUST SERVE A COPY OF IT ON ANY PARTY NOT…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Van Buskirk v. The United Group of CompaniesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2019
  2. Laing v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Chai v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2017
  4. Irene Eisenberg v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
  5. Myrna Labow v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Ronald Labow v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API