Legal Opinion

Burney v. . Holloway

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 28, 1945PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSeawell, J.

Since a proceeding to probate a will in common form is in rem, it has been held- — as far as we know without exception in this jurisdiction — that when the issue of devisavit vel non has been raised, the proceeding is not subject to nonsuit at the instance of the propounders or other parties concerned. In re Will of Evans, 223 N. C., 206, 25 S. E. (2d), 556; In re Westfeldt, 188 N. C., 702, 705, 125 S. E., 531; Collins v. Collins, 125 N. C., 98, 34 S. E., 195. Whether the disregard of this rule results in a void, or merely irregular, judgment we need not inquire, since in either case the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. In Re WestfeldtSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
  2. Collins v. . CollinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1899
  3. Schwren v. . FallsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1915
  4. Burcham v. . BurchamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
  5. Kerr v. Girdwood.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Poindexter v. WACHOVIA BANK AND TRUST COMPANYSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  2. In Re the Probate of the Last Will & Testament of HineSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1947
  3. Wing v. Wachovia Bank & Trust Co., NASupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  4. Finch v. HoneycuttSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
  5. BETTS BY AND THROUGH PARKER v. ParrishSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API