Legal Opinion

Horn v. Shirley

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided June 2, 1969No. 5-4930PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

George Nose Smith, Justice.

This action for personal injuries was tried before a jury and ended in a verdict for the defendant. At the trial the plaintiff (-on-tended that under Act 161 of 1937, which we will call our Labor Department Act, the measure of the defendant’s duty to provide the plaintiff with a safe place to work exceeded the common-law standard of ordinary care and in effect was that of an insurer. Ark. Stat. Ann. 81-101 through 81-121 (Repl. 1960). The trial court rejected that contention and submitted the case to the jury under AMI instructions which told the jury that at the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Spink v. MourtonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1962
  2. Gordon v. MatsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1969
  3. BELL TRANSPORATION COMPANY v. MoreheadSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1969
  4. Crush v. KaelinCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1967
  5. Transport Co. of Texas v. Arkansas Fuel Oil Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1946

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Steward v. McDonaldSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
  2. Blissett v. FrisbySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1970
  3. Phil Kennedy v. U. S. Construction Company and W. E. Sanders Construction CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1976
  4. Stoltze v. Arkansas Valley Electric Cooperative Corp.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2003
  5. Griffith Lumber Co. v. ConnorSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1973

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API