Horn v. Shirley
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
George Nose Smith, Justice.
This action for personal injuries was tried before a jury and ended in a verdict for the defendant. At the trial the plaintiff (-on-tended that under Act 161 of 1937, which we will call our Labor Department Act, the measure of the defendant’s duty to provide the plaintiff with a safe place to work exceeded the common-law standard of ordinary care and in effect was that of an insurer. Ark. Stat. Ann. 81-101 through 81-121 (Repl. 1960). The trial court rejected that contention and submitted the case to the jury under AMI instructions which told the jury that at the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Spink v. MourtonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1962
- Gordon v. MatsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1969
- BELL TRANSPORATION COMPANY v. MoreheadSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1969
- Crush v. KaelinCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1967
- Transport Co. of Texas v. Arkansas Fuel Oil Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1946
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Steward v. McDonaldSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
- Blissett v. FrisbySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1970
- Phil Kennedy v. U. S. Construction Company and W. E. Sanders Construction CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1976
- Stoltze v. Arkansas Valley Electric Cooperative Corp.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2003
- Griffith Lumber Co. v. ConnorSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1973
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.