Pullman Co. v. State
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHale, J.
When the railroads, according to a contractual formula, pay the Pullman Company sufficient funds to make good its operating losses, are such payments taxable under the public utility tax as a part of Pullman’s gross operating revenue? And if, by virtue of a contract between the railroads and the Pullman Company, the latter performs maintenance and repair work on electrical and air-conditioning apparatus and is reimbursed by the railroads for the actual costs of such work, are these reimbursements taxable as revenue received for retailing services under the business and occupation tax? The Tax…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Central Greyhound Lines, Inc. v. MealeySupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Calbom v. KnudtzonWashington Supreme Court · 1964
- Memphis Natural Gas Co. v. StoneSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Interstate Oil Pipe Line Co. v. StoneSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- King County Water District No. 68 v. Tax CommissionWashington Supreme Court · 1961
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Washington Telephone Co. v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1970
- Daves v. NastosCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1985
- Daves v. NastosCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1985
- First Data Merchant Services, LLC v. Dep't of RevenueCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2026