Legal Opinion
United States v. William M. Kelly
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided October 15, 1992No. 91-5645PublishedCited by 36 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judge:
William M. Kelly was indicted and tried for conspiring to violate the Bank Bribery Act, 18 U.S.C. § 215, and the Bank Fraud Act, 18 U.S.C. § 1344. A jury subsequently found Kelly guilty on all charged counts. On appeal, Kelly argues that the district court improperly: (1) denied his motion for continuance; (2) denied his request to produce evidence; and (3) admitted the hearsay statements of a coconspirator. Kelly also contends that the Bank Bribery Act is unconstitutionally vague as applied to his case.' Finding no error, we affirm Kelly’s conviction.
I
The facts…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Richardson v. MarshSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- United States v. Rita Ann Cardenas and Shamsideen Abiodun LawalCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
- United States v. Terry Burton KimbroughCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995
- United States v. KroutCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995
- United States v. Armando Correa-VenturaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993
- United States v. Billie Mac Jobe, Stephen Taylor, Philip Mark Sutton, Stanley Pruet Jobe, and Fernando NovoaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.