Knox v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the CourtGerber, J.
The defendant appeals his conviction for three counts of robbery with a firearm. He primarily argues that the trial court violated the Confrontation Clause by allowing the state to perpetuate the videotaped testimony of one of the three victims and present that videotaped testimony at trial. We agree with the defendant’s argument, reverse the defendant’s convictions, and remand for a new trial.
The victims told the police that they were walking down a street at night when a man approached them. One of the victims thought she recognized the man from far away, but when he got five to six feet…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State v. DiGuilioSupreme Court of Florida · 1986
- Harrell v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1998
- Still v. Justice Administrative CommissionDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012
- Lima v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999
- Slawinski v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Alexander v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012