Legal Opinion

City of Auburn v. Mayer

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided February 23, 1899No. 8741PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error from the district court of Nemaha county. Tried below before Stull, J.

1Opinion of the Court

Irvine, C.

This action was begun by Mayer against the city of Auburn in the county court to recover certain unearned license money and money paid for an occupation tax. Mayer had judgment, and the city took the case on error to the district court, where the judgment was affirmed. The city now brings the case here. The facts are undisputed. Mayer applied for a license to sell intoxicating liquors. The license was granted, but subsequently an appeal was taken to the district court by remonstrators, and in consequence of mandamus proceedings, for that purpose the council was compelled to revoke…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Lydick v. KornerNebraska Supreme Court · 1884
  2. State ex rel. Conway v. WeberNebraska Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Chamberlain v. City of TecumsehNebraska Supreme Court · 1895
  4. School District No. 34 v. ThompsonNebraska Supreme Court · 1897
  5. State ex rel. Johnson v. CornwellNebraska Supreme Court · 1882

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Allsman v. Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
  2. Claussen v. City of LuverneSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1908
  3. Gubin v. City of New YorkCity of New York Municipal Court · 1934
  4. Shue v. School DistrictNebraska Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Shue v. Village of Silver CreekNebraska Supreme Court · 1915

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API