Big Black v. Ball

Application unanimously denied and petition dismissed. Memorandum: Petitioner seeks a writ of prohibition claiming that respondent Justice of the Supreme Court has acted contrary to law in various respects as outlined in the petition. It is well settled that prohibition may be used "to restrain an inferior court from exceeding its authorized powers in a proceeding over which it has jurisdiction” (Matter of Hogan v Court of General Sessions of County of N Y 296 NY 1, 8; see, also, Matter of Lee v County Ct. of Erie County, 27 NY2d 432). It should be noted that the petition contains innumerable…