Legal Opinion

Salyer v. Clinchfield Coal Corp.

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided September 6, 1950No. Record 3692PublishedCited by 6 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the CourtMiller, J.

On January 21, 1949, Plez Salyer, appellant, hereinafter called claimant, filed an application before the Industrial Commission of Virginia asserting that he was entitled to compensation from CHnchfield Coal Corporation, appellee, due to disability caused by silicosis, an occupational disease contracted by him while in its employ. From an award of the Commission which denied compensation, this appeal was granted.

The evidence discloses that until he became partiahy disabled and ceased work on October 13, 1948, claimant had been in the continuous employ of appellee, Working in its coal mines…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Pocahontas Corp. v. RichardsonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1947

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Tomes v. James City (County Of) FireCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2002
  2. George H. Samartino v. Fairfax County Fire and RescueCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2015
  3. Shanahan v. Pocahontas Fuel Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1952
  4. Arthur M. Lipscomb v. City of LynchburgCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2014
  5. Boucher v. John Swenson Granite Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1962

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API