Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Iowa Department of Human Services v. Pierce

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided September 19, 1990No. 89-1189PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HARRIS, Justice.

Defendants had been receiving public assistance but became ineligible when one of them inherited some property. Although defendants made timely and full disclosure, the State agency, through its own error, continued to pay benefits for two months. The question is whether the agency can recover the two months’ payments. The trial court held it can and we agree.

The benefits were in the form of aid to families with dependent children (AFDC). Defendants, Marlene Kay Pierce and Timothy Craig Pierce, began receiving AFDC benefits in 1986. In August of that year Marlene told her case…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State Ex Rel. Department of Human Services v. BrooksSupreme Court of Iowa · 1987

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Roberts v. Total Health Care, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1998
  2. Marshall v. State Department of Human ServicesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API