Legal Opinion · Dissent

Schulman v. Group Health Inc.

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided March 28, 2006Published

1DissentMcCooe, J.

Plaintiffs coverage under the Group Health insurance plan was limited to “medically necessary” services and excluded cosmetic surgery except reconstructive surgery which is not present here. Following the denial of the requisite preapproval for the surgical procedure and both an adverse internal and external appeal, the surgical procedure was performed. The plaintiff commenced this action seeking reimbursement for the medical expenses of the surgery.

The issue is whether the plaintiff established that the surgical procedure was “medically necessary.” The essence of *93plaintiff’s claim is that…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Lee v. Consolidated Edison Co.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1978
  2. Nenno v. Blue Cross & Blue ShieldAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  3. Rollock v. Gerald Modell Inc.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API