Legal Opinion

Crocker v. . Crocker

New York Court of Appeals

Decided March 5, 1865PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWright, J.

We must apply the law to the facts found •by the judge at Special Term, and cannot look into the evidence (as it was the province of the court below on appeal to do) and affirm or reverse the judgment, as we shall agree or disagree with the original tribunal as to the facts. The reversal of the judgment at the General Term not being stated in it to be on the facts, is deemed to have been on the law alone, as applied to the facts found by the judge; and the questions of fact are not, therefore, open to review here. (Code, § 268.)

This disposes of the question so elaborately argued by the…

2Cited by16 opinions

  1. Weaver v. . BardenNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
  2. Ballard v. . BurgettNew York Court of Appeals · 1869
  3. Central Trust Co v. West India Improvement Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1901
  4. Case v. . PhelpsNew York Court of Appeals · 1868
  5. Brewster v. SimeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1871

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API