Legal Opinion

Hardy v. Keene

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided December 5, 1891Published

Bill in Equity, to foreclose a mortgage. The court found that the bill should be dismissed, and the plaintiff excepted.

1Opinion of the CourtBlodgett, J.

Bill in equity to foreclose a mortgage upon land in Roxbury formerly owned by Osborne & Hale, and which was sold and conveyed by them, February 1, 1870, to one Ruggles for the agreed price of $500, for which he gave them his notes of that date secured by a mortgage of the premises. September 2 of that year Ruggles borrowed of the plaintiff’s wife, Josephine M. Hardy, $325, for which he gave her his note, secured by a second mortgage of the same premises; and this is the mortgage now sought to be foreclosed. Josephine having deceased, the plaintiff, as administrator of her estate, brought suit…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Page v. WhiddenSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1880
  2. Appleton v. Phenix Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1880
  3. Chamberlain v. LyndeboroughSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1888
  4. Gilbert v. ManchesterSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1875
  5. Buzzell v. HardySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1878

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API