Legal Opinion

National Bond & Share Corp. v. Hoey

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided April 15, 1936PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

PATTERSON, District Judge.

The motion is for summary judgment under rule 113 of the New York Rules of Civil Practice.

*788The action is one at law to recover stock transfer stamp tax paid under 'protest. The complaint shows that the plaintiff purchased for investment a large number of shares of stock of various corporations. Guaranty Trust Company acted as custodian of the stocks for the plaintiff. The course of business was for the brokers who acted for the plaintiff in purchasing the stocks to deliver the certificates to the trust company without change of registry. The frust company would then…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Lawyers' Mortgage Co. v. AndersonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1933
  2. Lawyers Mortgage Co. v. AndersonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1935

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Automatic Washer Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API