Legal Opinion

In re Cameron

District Court, E.D. Illinois

Decided April 18, 1934No. 2263PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

LIND LE Y, District Judge.

The bankrupt scheduled as a part of his assets, under the heading “Debts due petitioner on open account,” the sum of $757.15 due from Bartlett Frazier Company, Chicago, Ill. This money the trustee has collected. The bankrupt having no chattel property, the trustee filed report that there were no exemptions to be set off to him. The bankrupt thereupon objected to the report, claiming $400 as exempt under the statute of the state of Illinois, and prayed that the same might be set off to him from the moneys collected from Bartlett Frazier Company. The referee found that…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Dent v. West VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  2. Neal v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  3. Chapman v. Forsyth & LimerickSupreme Court of the United States · 1844
  4. Crawford v. BurkeSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
  5. Upshur v. BriscoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1891

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Canada Permanent Trust Co. v. FeilchenfeldCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API