Legal Opinion

State v. Fabal

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided May 25, 2021No. 20AP-86PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[Cite as State v. Fabal,

2021-Ohio-1793.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT State of Ohio, : Plaintiff-Appellee, : No. 20AP-86 v. : (C.P.C. No. 17CR-4062) Andrew Fabal, : (REGULAR CALENDAR) Defendant-Appellant. : D E C I S I O N Rendered on May 25, 2021 On brief: [G. Gary Tyack], Prosecuting Attorney, and Sheryl L. Prichard, for appellee. Argued: Sheryl L. Prichard. On brief: Blaise G. Baker, for appellant. Argued: Blaise G. Baker. APPEAL from the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas KLATT, J. {¶ 1} Defendant-appellant, Andrew Fabal, appeals from a judgment of…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. State v. ThompkinsOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  3. State v. JenksOhio Supreme Court · 1991
  4. State v. MartinOhio Court of Appeals · 1983
  5. Manson v. BrathwaiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1977

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. ShortOhio Court of Appeals · 2024
  2. State v. MitchellOhio Court of Appeals · 2025
  3. State v. WilliamsOhio Court of Appeals · 2021
  4. State v. LongOhio Court of Appeals · 2021
  5. State v. ParoOhio Court of Appeals · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API