Legal Opinion

Catlett v. Knoxville, Sevierville & Eastern Railway Co.

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1908PublishedCited by 7 opinions

FROM SEVIER. Appeal from the Circuit Court of Sevier County.— G. Me. Hendeeson, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Neil

After the necessary preliminaries required by the statute had been complied with, the quarterly court of Sevier county ordered that an election should be held on the 14th of December, 1907, by the election commissioners of the county, to obtain the sense of the people as to whether the county should subscribe $150,000 to the capital stock of the defendant railway company. Pursuant to the statute, it was directed that those in favor of the subscription should put upon their tickets the words “For subscription,” and those opposing should put upon their tickets the words “No subscription.” The…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Lindsay v. AllenTennessee Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Hopkins v. City of DuluthSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1900
  3. State ex rel. Hocknell v. RoperNebraska Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Cross v. KeathleyTennessee Supreme Court · 1907

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Wahl v. SpeerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1920
  2. State ex rel. Short v. ClausenWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  3. O'Neil v. JonesTennessee Supreme Court · 1947
  4. Blaine v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Dickinson County Memorial Hospital Corp. v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1957

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API