Legal Opinion

Gaines v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided February 19, 1937No. A-9141PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBarefoot, J.

The first question presented in this case is the refusal of the trial court to sustain the motion filed by the defendant to furnish a record at the expense of the county. Evidence was heard upon this motion and showed that the defendant had been released on a $3,000 bond, signed by his mother; that his people owned property; and that he had hired a lawyer to defend him in this case. The court, after hearing the testimony, refused to order the record at the expense of the county. The statute of this state, section 3823, St. 1931, provides:

“The judge may, upon the application of either party in…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Harris v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1914
  2. Reed v. United StatesCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1909
  3. Day v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1912
  4. Moore v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1926

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Copenhaver v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1967
  2. Braden v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1955
  3. Neal v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1960
  4. Palmore v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1937
  5. Penny v. State ex rel. EdmistonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1976

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API