Legal Opinion

Aluizio v. Van Kanegan

District Court, N.D. Ohio

Decided August 8, 2025No. 4:23-cv-02399Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION JORDAN ALUIZIO, ) CASE NO.: 4:23-cv-02399 ) Plaintiff, ) JUDGE BRIDGET MEEHAN BRENNAN ) v. ) ) CORY VAN KANEGAN, ) MEMORANDUM OPINION ) AND ORDER Defendant. ) Before the Court is the Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 24) filed by Defendant Cory Van Kanegan (“Defendant” or “Van Kanegan”). Plaintiff Jordan Aulizio (“Plaintiff” or “Aulizio”)1 responded in opposition (Doc. 26), and Defendant replied (Doc. 28). For the reasons stated herein, Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED. I. BACKGROUND A. Statement of…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Pearson v. CallahanSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  4. County of Sacramento v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  5. DeShaney v. Winnebago County Department of Social ServicesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API