Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Keppel

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 23, 1974No. Appeal, 339PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Price, J.,

This is an appeal from a judgment of sentence for burglary and larceny. The only issue raised on appeal is whether the trial judge committed reversible error in that part of his charge to the jury related to the testimony of an alleged accomplice.

The accomplice testified that the appellant and he spent time together on the night of the crime. During that time, they drove through Bethlehem, Pa., and cruised by ai house where appellant said they could find money. The men parked the car and started walking toward the house, but the accomplice returned to the car. He further…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Dilliplaine v. Lehigh Valley Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  2. Commonwealth v. ClantonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  3. Commonwealth v. WatlingtonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  4. Commonwealth v. PorterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
  5. Commonwealth v. JONESSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1968

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Piscanio AppealSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  2. Commonwealth v. WalleySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  3. United States ex rel. Harding v. MarksDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1975
  4. Commonwealth v. KeppelSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API