Legal Opinion

Hicks v. Unborn Children of Hicks

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 8, 1963No. 457PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtDeNNY, C.J.

The sole assignment of error is to the signing of the judgment for that such judgment is contrary to law.

The appellant contends there is an irrebuttable presumption that the possibility of issue is not extinct until death. Therefore, -he argues the court was in error in its conclusion with respect to the inability of the plaintiff to conveive and bear children, and, as a consequence of this erroneous conclusion, the court below erroneously held that the plaintiff, Marcellite Pool Hicks, is the owner of the bonds and cash balance now held by the Clerk of the Superior Court of Wake County, as…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. Provident Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. McPherson v. First & Citizens National Bank of Elizabeth CitySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  3. Shuford v. . BradySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1915
  4. Prince v. . BarnesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
  5. Security National Bank of Greensboro v. HannahSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. De Lotbiniere v. Wachovia Bank & Trust Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API