Legal Opinion
Brusco v. New York State Division of Housing & Community Renewal
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided February 5, 1991PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Helen Freedman, J.) entered September 29, 1989, which dismissed the landlord’s petition seeking review of a determination of the New York State Division of Housing and Community Renewal which established the lawful stabilized rent for the subject housing unit and directed petitioner to refund rent overcharges to the tenant, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
The tenant in apartment IB at 118 West 69th Street, New York, New York, filed a rent overcharge complaint on February 15, 1984. The petitioner, who is the landlord of those premises, failed to…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Hotel Dorset Co. v. Trust for Cultural ResourcesNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
- Lavanant v. State Division of Housing & Community RenewalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- Realty v. State Division of Housing & Community RenewalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
3Cited by10 opinions
- 985 Fifth Avenue Inc. v. State Division of Housing & Community RenewalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- 72A Realty Associates v. New York City Environmental Control BoardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- L&M Bus Corp. v. New York City Department of EducationAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Rizzo v. New York State Division of Housing & Community RenewalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Gilman v. New York State Division of Housing & Community RenewalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.