Palladio, Inc. v. Diamond
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
MANSFIELD, District Judge.
It is now generally recognized that the destruction or disturbance of vital life cycles or of the balance of a species of wildlife, even though initiated in one part of the world, may have a profound effect upon the health and welfare of people in other distant parts. We have come to appreciate the interdependence of different forms of life. We realize that by killing certain species in one area we may sound our own death knell.
For these reasons ecology has become everyone’s business. Like pollution it does not cease to be of vital concern merely because the problem…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Florida Lime & Avocado Growers, Inc. v. PaulSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Nebbia v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Bi-Metallic Investment Co. v. State Board of EqualizationSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Barrett v. . State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1917
- A. E. Nettleton Co. v. DiamondNew York Court of Appeals · 1970
3Cited by13 opinions
- Viva! International Voice for Animals v. Adidas Promotional Retail Operations, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2007
- American Can Co. v. Oregon Liquor Control CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1973
- Brown v. Market Development, Inc., Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Hamilton County1974
- Salstrom's Vehicles, Inc. v. Department of Motor VehiclesWashington Supreme Court · 1976
- People v. K. Sakai Co.California Court of Appeal · 1976
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.