Legal Opinion

Crenshaw v. Renico

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided April 7, 2003No. 2:02-cv-70518PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER DENYING THE PETITIONS FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

EDMUNDS, District Judge.

I. Introduction

Michael Crenshaw, (“Petitioner”), presently confined at the St. Louis Correctional Facility in St. Louis, Michigan, seeks the issuance of a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. In his application, filed pro se, petitioner challenges the legality of his convictions after a bench trial before Judge David P. Kerwin in the Recorder’s Court for the City of Detroit of one count of first degree murder, M.C.L. § 750.316(l)(a),and one count of possession of a firearm during the…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  4. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Cukaj v. WarrenDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2004
  2. Abraitis v. HortonDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2019
  3. Arnold v. MackieDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2020
  4. Coleman v. JacksonDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2021
  5. Donaldson v. WarrenDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2020

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API