Crosby v. Seaboard Air Line Ry.
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Before AYatts, J., Hampton, March, 1909. Action by Addie and H. S*. Crosby against Seaboard Air Line Railway. Prom Circuit order, refusing motion to amend complaint, plaintiffs appeal. Messrs.
Read the full summary
Before AYatts, J., Hampton, March, 1909. Action by Addie and H. S*. Crosby against Seaboard Air Line Railway. Prom Circuit order, refusing motion to amend complaint, plaintiffs appeal. Messrs. Griffin and Tracy cite: Error to refuse motion: 81 S. C., 571. Rule 2f does not apply: 81 S. C., 31; 82 S. C., 1. The latter cite: Under Rule 2J judgment of Supreme Court ended case: 82 S. C., 1; 78 S. C., 381; 69 S. C., 331; 68 S. C., 99; Code of Proc., 12; 22 S'. C., 313; 16 S. €., 300, 621; 11 S. C., 358, 585; 13 S'. C., 33; 5 S. C., 262; 3 S. C., 335; 17 S. C., 217. Omission of allegation is not due…
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
Mr. Justice Woods.
The question involved in this appeal is whether this Court should reverse an order of Judge Watts, refusing motion to amend the complaint.
The plaintiffs recovered judgment in the Circuit Court for $5,000, under a complaint which aleged injuries sustained by Mrs. Crosby while alighting from defendant’s moving train at Midway, Florida, in obedience to the “wilful, unlawful and reckless” direction of the conductor. From that judgment the defendant appealed; one of the exceptions alleging error in the refusal of the Circuit Judge to…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Taylor v. Atlantic Coast Line R. R.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1908
- Leesville Mfg. Co. v. Morgan Wood & Iron WorksSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1906
- Cousar v. Heath, Witherspoon & Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1908
3Cited by2 opinions
- Halsall v. Atlantic Coast Line R. R.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1915
- Farmer v. Atlantic Coast Line R.District Court, E.D. South Carolina · 1913