Legal Opinion

McHenry v. Heiderich

New York Supreme Court

Decided July 15, 1929PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSenn, J.

On July 1, 1922, the defendants Herman Heiderich and Fred Heiderich, father and son, were copartners in the retail shoe business at Oneida, N. Y., and had been for about five years. On that date the partnership was dissolved, the father withdrawing and the business being continued by the son. Up to that time the father had furnished the money that went into the business and the son had conducted the store. On the dissolution the son purchased his father’s interest for the sum of $6,400, for which he gave his promissory note and agreed to secure it by a chattel mortgage of the same amount upon…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Benedict v. RatnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  2. Potts v. . HartNew York Court of Appeals · 1885

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re Rosom Utilities, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1938
  2. In re the General Assignment for the Benefit of Creditors of Gruber, New York County Courts1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API