Legal Opinion

Sora v. Kelly

New York Supreme Court

Decided October 7, 1957PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtNicholas M. Pette, J.

The plaintiffs, vendors of real property under a contract of purchase and sale dated March 27, 1957 instituted this action for specific performance of said contract. The defendants have counterclaimed for the return of their down payment of $1,000, and $106, the net cost of examining title. Both sides now move for summary judgment.

The contract involves a lot 25 by 100 feet. The 25 feet front on 95th Avenue and the 100 feet are parallel with 113th Street, Jamaica. In 1949, a one and one-half story brick and frame dwelling was constructed on the property, with the structure only 1.34 feet from…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Fleming v. . BurnhamNew York Court of Appeals · 1885
  2. Vought v. . WilliamsNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
  3. Heller v. PopeNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
  4. McPherson v. . SchadeNew York Court of Appeals · 1896
  5. Chesebro v. . MoersNew York Court of Appeals · 1922

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Rodolitz v. Bel Canto Fancy Foods, Ltd. (In Re Rodolitz Holding Corp.)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API