Legal Opinion
Util. L. Rep. P 14,202 Northern Border Pipeline Company v. 86.72 Acres of Land
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided May 14, 1998No. 98-1167PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FLAUM, Circuit Judge.'
With a federal certificate of necessity in hand, Northern Border Pipeline Company initiated eminent domain proceedings in the district court to acquire land for an extension of a natural gas pipeline into the Chicago area. Not content with the pace of an ordinary eminent domain proceeding, Northern Border moved for immediate possession of the lands in question and suggested that the churt settle the issue of just compensation later. The district court denied this motion for immediate possession, and we affirm.
On August 1, 1997, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Meridian Mutual Insurance Company v. Meridian Insurance Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
- Northern Border Pipeline Co. v. 127.79 Acres of LandDistrict Court, D. North Dakota · 1981
- Square D Co. v. Fastrak Softworks, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
3Cited by23 opinions
- East Tennessee Natural Gas Co. v. SageCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2004
- Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC v. 6.56 Acres of LandCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2019
- Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC v. Gail Brandon CochranCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2018
- Transcon. Gas Pipe Line Co. v. Permanent Easements for 2.14 Acres & Temp. Easements for 3.59 Acres in Conestoga Twp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2018
- Alliance Pipeline L.P. v. 4.360 Acres of LandCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2014
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.