Legal Opinion

United States v. Kenneth Karl Kimler

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided August 5, 1998No. 97-20320PublishedCited by 94 opinions

1Per curiam

Kimler requests a COA for issues the district court deemed unworthy of collateral review. We first turn to the question of when a circuit judge may grant a COA upon issues denied certification by the district court. Reading Fed. R.App. P. 22(b) with 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(3), we conclude that a notice of appeal is not a constructive request for review of issues refused certification by the district court where the district court certified some but not all issues. Rather, we will not review a denial of a COA in such circumstances unless petitioner requests that we do so.

I

In Lackey v. Johnson, 116…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Lindh v. MurphySupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  3. James R. Kincade v. Emmit L. Sparkman, Warden Commonwealth of Kentucky, Anthony L. Hereford v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
  4. Lackey v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1997
  5. Anthony Porter v. Richard B. Gramley, Warden, Pontiac Correctional CenterCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by94 opinions

  1. Ott v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1999
  2. United States v. Kenneth Karl KimlerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1999
  3. United States v. WilliamsonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1999
  4. Bui v. DiPaoloCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1999
  5. United States v. WebsterCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2004

89 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API