Legal Opinion

United States v. Roy A. Frost

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided October 6, 1970No. 7558_1PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COFFIN, Circuit Judge.

Appellant seeks reversal of his narcotics conviction because of an asserted denial of his constitutional and procedural rights to a speedy trial, the time elapsing between arrest and trial being 31 months. Appellant’s offenses were committed in June of 1967. The indictment was returned over thirteen months later, in August, 1968. Trial was had eighteen months later, in February, 1970. During the earlier period, preceding indictment, arraignment, and appointment of counsel, appellant and the government were dancing a minuet in which the latter was hoping to gain helpful…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. EwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Howard Ross v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1965
  3. United States v. Ralph F. DeleoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1970
  4. United States v. ProvooDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1955

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. United States v. Louis Moschiano and Robert Fred Bishop, in Re Stephen M. KomieCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982
  2. Commonwealth v. RegoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1971
  3. United States v. Patrick Emory, T/n Patrick EmeryCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1972
  4. United States v. Steven Elmer Roell and Carrie Lee ManningCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1973
  5. United States v. George Decosta, Jr.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1970

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API