Legal Opinion
Clemons v. Farmers Hardware Co.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided May 21, 1923No. 14130PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the CourtJenkins, P. J.
1. “ When a known, described, and definite article is ordered of a manufacturer, although it be stated by the purchaser that it is required for a particular purpose, yet if the known, described, and definite thing, which is of the kind and quality called for by the order, be actually supplied, there is no warranty that it shall answer the particular purpose intended by the buyer.” Fay & Egan Co. v. Dudley, 129 Ga. 314 (1) (58 S. E. 826); Crankshaw v. Schweitier Mfg. Co., 1 Ga. App. 363, 364 (12) (58 S. E. 222); DeLoach &c. Co. v. Tutweiler Co., 2 Ga. App. 493 (58 S. E. 790); Hawley Furnace…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- City of Moultrie v. Schofield's Sons Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1909
- Fay & Eagan Co. v. Dudley & SonsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1907
- John A. Roebling's Sons Co. v. Southern Power Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1914
- Hawley Down Draft Furnace Co. v. Van Winkle Gin & Machine WorksCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1908
- Crankshaw v. Schweizer Manufacturing Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Colt Co. v. MalloryCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1926