Legal Opinion

Debara DeCamp v. Nancy Berryhill

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided February 26, 2019No. 18-2105PublishedCited by 332 opinions

1Per curiam

Debara DeCamp, a 55-year old woman, challenges the denial of her applications for Disability Insurance Benefits and Supplemental Security Income, in which she claimed disability based on a benign brain tumor, neck and back issues, and bipolar disorder. DeCamp argues that the administrative law judge erred by failing to (1) evaluate properly DeCamp's limits with concentration, persistence, or pace, (2) support her decision to limit DeCamp to 10 percent off-task time for purposes of assessing residual functional capacity ("RFC"), and (3) support her adverse credibility determination. We agree…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Melissa Varga v. Carolyn ColvinCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2015
  2. Kip Yurt v. Carolyn ColvinCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2014
  3. Alejandro Moreno v. Nancy BerryhillCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2018
  4. Joshua Lanigan v. Nancy A. BerryhillCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2017
  5. Louquetta O'Connor-Spinner v. Carolyn ColvinCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2016

3Cited by332 opinions

  1. Bettie Burmester v. Nancy BerryhillCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2019
  2. Christopher Jozefyk v. Nancy BerryhillCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2019
  3. Tara Crump v. Andrew M. SaulCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2019
  4. Gail Martin v. Andrew M. SaulCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2020
  5. ALLISON v. KIJAKAZIDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 2023

327 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API