Legal Opinion

Pucket v. Johnson

Texas Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1876PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Error from McLennan. Tried below before the Hon. J. W. Oliver.

1Opinion of the Court

Moore, Associate Justice.

The defendants in error, who were plaintiffs in the court below, allege in their petition that Julia Pucket is the widow, and Layton and Belle Pucket are the minor children, without guardian, of Layton E. Pucket, deceased, and that said widow and children are the sole heirs of his estate; that all the property belonging to said Layton F: Pucket at his death was community property of said Lay-ton and Julia; that she had returned an inventory of said *551property, and is in possession of and administering it as survivor of said community. They ask that a special guardian be…

2Cited by9 opinions

  1. Johnson v. DarrTexas Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Jones v. ParkerTexas Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Brooke v. ClarkTexas Supreme Court · 1880
  4. Bond v. DillardTexas Supreme Court · 1878
  5. Kidd v. PrinceCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1916

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API