Legal Opinion

Ragosta v. State of Vt.

District Court, D. Vermont

Decided December 11, 1981No. Civ. A. 80-189PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

COFFRIN, District Judge.

This is a civil action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983, 1985, and 1986 for the alleged violation of plaintiff’s constitutional rights. The action arises out of certain aspects of an action for divorce filed against plaintiff in the Vermont Superior Court by defendant Frances Ragosta (Frances). This court has jurisdiction over the subject matter of this lawsuit pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1343. In his original complaint, plaintiff asserts claims against Frances and against the attorneys and the members of the Vermont bench involved in various stages…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Edelman v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Stump v. SparkmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. Pierson v. RaySupreme Court of the United States · 1967

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Katz v. MorgenthauDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1989
  2. In Re Secretary Of The Department Of Crime Control And Public SafetyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1993
  3. Libercent v. AldrichSupreme Court of Vermont · 1987
  4. Daniel v. American Board of Emergency MedicineDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1997
  5. Barfield v. BlackwoodCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1993

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API