Legal Opinion
United States v. Greer
District Court, D. Vermont
Decided February 19, 1997No. 2:95-cr-00072PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER: MARITIME DRUG LAW ENFORCEMENT ACT
SESSIONS, District Judge.
Defendants Greer, Hutchins, Cook, Scott and Koski have variously moved to dismiss Count 4 of the superseding indictment on due process grounds and for improper venue (papers 209, 216, 221, 224, 237, 240). In addition, Greer moves for a change of venue to the United States District Court for the District of Columbia (paper 237). For the reasons that follow, Defendants’ motions to dismiss are denied. Greer’s motion for change of venue is denied.
Count 4 charges that the defendants conspired to commit offenses against…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Plyler v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Blackmer v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Skiriotes v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. ButlerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1999
- United States v. GreerDistrict Court, D. Vermont · 1998