Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Buckner
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
Case 49 — PETITION EQUITY APPEAL EROM LOUISVILLE CHANCERY COURT. CITED Wheaton’s Int. Law, by Dana, secs. 545, 546, and note 169. Coke upon Lyttleton, section 412. 2Dallas, 102, Hoar v. Allen and tenants. 2 Dallas, 132, Foxeraft & Galloway v. Nagle. 1 Peters’s C. O. R. 524, Conn v. Penn. 3 Wash.
Read the full summary
Case 49 — PETITION EQUITY APPEAL EROM LOUISVILLE CHANCERY COURT. CITED Wheaton’s Int. Law, by Dana, secs. 545, 546, and note 169. Coke upon Lyttleton, section 412. 2Dallas, 102, Hoar v. Allen and tenants. 2 Dallas, 132, Foxeraft & Galloway v. Nagle. 1 Peters’s C. O. R. 524, Conn v. Penn. 3 Wash. C. C. R. 403, Denniston, &c. v. Imbell. 4 Wheaton, 246, United States v. Rice. 9 Howard, 663, Fleming v. Page. 3Phillimore’s International Law, page 734. 16 Howard, 164, Cross v. Harrison. CITED Wheaton, Lawrence’s, 520, 522, part 4, chapter 1. Vattel, book 3, chapters 12, 18. Broom’s Legal Maxims,…
1Opinion of the Court
JUDGE HARDIN
delivered the opinion oe the court.
During the late civil war the appellee, a citizen of Kentucky, and the owner of valuable property therein, became engaged as a general officer in the military service of the Confederate States, and in that capacity was with their army, commanded by General A. S. Johnston, at Bowling Green, Ky., in October, 1861. It appears that about that time, for military purposes offensive or defensive, a bridge on the line of the Louisville & Nashville Railroad over Green River was, with other property of the appellant, wholly or partially destroyed by the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Crutcher v. HordCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1868
3Cited by3 opinions
- Maryland Casualty Co. v. VidigojCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1925
- In re the Judicial Settlement of the Account of Central Union Trust Co.New York Surrogate's Court · 1922
- Thornton v. BlackCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1943