Legal Opinion

Appleby v. St. Paul City Railway Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 14, 1893PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal by plaintiff, Ernest Y. Appleby, from an order of the District Court of Ramsey County, J. J. Egan, J., made January 6, 1893, denying his motion for a new trial.

1Opinion of the CourtDickinson, J.

This action is for the recovery of damages for the forcible expulsion of the plaintiff from a street car of the defendant on its Selby avenue cable line. At the trial the court dismissed the action when the plaintiff rested his case. We shall only have to consider whether the evidence showed that the expulsion of the plaintiff from the car, in connection with the circumstances preceding it, was wrongful, so that the case should have gone to the jury.

Attention will be directed to what may conveniently be called two lines of street railway, connecting on Selby avenue at a cross street called…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Dwinelle v. . N.Y.C. H.R.R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1890
  2. Lake Erie & Western Railway Co. v. FixIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  3. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy R. R. v. GriffinIllinois Supreme Court · 1873
  4. Murdock v. Boston & Albany RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1884
  5. Philadelphia, Wilmington & Baltimore Railroad v. RiceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1885

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Indianapolis Street Railway Co. v. WilsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Evansville & Terre Haute Railroad v. CatesIndiana Court of Appeals · 1895
  3. Morrill v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1908
  4. Mogan v. CarterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
  5. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. BeckettIndiana Court of Appeals · 1895

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API