Legal Opinion
Peters v. M & O Construction, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided May 11, 1978No. 1 CA-CIV 3628PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
OGG, Judge.
The issues raised in this appeal are whether the trial court erred in 1) denying a motion to enlarge the time for service of an amended complaint and alias summonses; 2) granting a motion to abate the summonses; and 3) dismissing the cause of action with prejudice because the statute of limitations had run.
On August 29, 1973, plaintiff/appellant Charles P. Peters was injured while acting in the scope of his employment. He retained a lawyer to represent him in both the workmen’s compensation proceeding and a civil action against any potential third parties. This appeal…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Ruby Humphreys, Administratrix of the Estate of William Orvie Humphreys, Deceased v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1959
- Bomer v. RibicoffCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1962
- Eldridge v. JaggerArizona Supreme Court · 1957
- Henshaw v. MaysCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1973
- Martinez v. Bucyrus-Erie CompanyArizona Supreme Court · 1976
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Ricardo Santana v. Holiday Inns, Inc., Gene Johnson, Randy Scheets, Bruce Faltin as Employees Holiday Inns, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
- Hosogai v. KadotaArizona Supreme Court · 1985
- Maher v. UrmanCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2005
- Schwartz v. Arizona Primary Care PhysiciansCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1998
- Grim v. Anheuser-Busch, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1987
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.