Legal Opinion

Supreme Commandery Knights of Golden Rule v. Rose

Texas Supreme Court

Decided November 7, 1884No. Case No. 1763PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Appeal from Kaufman. Tried below before the Hon. Green J. Clark.

1Opinion of the Court

Willie, Chief Justice.

This cause is brought here upon a single assignment of error, to the effect that the court erred in refusing to state in writing its conclusions of fact separate from its conclusions of law, as requested by the appellant’s counsel.

There is in the transcript a motion filed by appellant’s counsel which amounts to such a request, but there is nothing to show that it was ever brought to the attention of the court, or insisted upon by the counsel making it.

We are asked to infer that it was refused because there is in the record no statement by the judge of his conclusions of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Floyd v. RiceTexas Supreme Court · 1866
  2. Campion v. AngierTexas Supreme Court · 1856
  3. Harrison v. CottonTexas Supreme Court · 1860
  4. Chambers v. MillerTexas Supreme Court · 1852
  5. McMahan v. BusbyTexas Supreme Court · 1867

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Hess v. DeanTexas Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Texas Cent. R. Co. v. DumasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1912
  3. Cleveland v. SimsTexas Supreme Court · 1887
  4. El Paso & Northeastern Railroad v. SawyerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1909
  5. Gunst v. Dallas Trust & Savings BankCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1928

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API