Legal Opinion

Widman v. Ashcraft

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided November 24, 1947No. 15,820PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Alter

Earl Ralph Widman, plaintiff in error here, plaintiff below, brought an action against Grover Cleveland Ash-craft to recover judgment for damages allegedy sustained by him as the result of a collision between the automobiles owned by the respective parties. Defendant’s motion for summary judgment was granted and judgment entered accordingly. Plaintiff here seeks a reversal.

The complaint was based on negligence; defendant by answer denied his negligence; and in separate defenses plead plaintiff’s negligence and unavoidable accident.

Defendant introduced in evidence plaintiff’s deposition, and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hatfield v. BarnesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1946
  2. Bauserman v. WhiteSupreme Court of Colorado · 1941

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Gleason v. GuzmanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1981
  2. Tamblyn v. City & County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1948
  3. Ridgewood Mobile Homes Park, Inc. v. Alemeda Water & Sanitation DistrictSupreme Court of Colorado · 1966
  4. Gleason v. GuzmanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1981
  5. Greenlee v. ChastainCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1965

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API