Legal Opinion

Luthi v. Evans

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided March 18, 1977No. 48,327PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Spencer, J.:

Plaintiffs, as successors in title of the original lessors, brought suit to cancel an oil and gas lease (known as the *115Kufahl lease) on land in Coffey County, Kansas. Defendant John R. Evans is the undisputed owner of the lease in zones above the Mississippi lime formation as well as a small overriding royalty interest in the zones below. Defendants J. R. Burris (hereinafter Burris) and International Tours, Inc. (hereinafter Tours) each claim ownership of the lease in the zones below the Mississippi lime (deep zones), subject to the Evans interest, from a common assignor. The trial…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Texas Consolidated Oils v. BartelsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1954
  2. Ingram v. IngramSupreme Court of Kansas · 1974
  3. Poplin v. MundellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1882
  4. Hollinger v. Imperial Warehouse Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1927
  5. In Re Estate of CrawfordSupreme Court of Kansas · 1954

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Luthi v. EvansSupreme Court of Kansas · 1978
  2. Baker Hughes Oilfield Operations, Inc. v. Union Bank of California, N.A. (In Re Cornerstone E & P Co.)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Texas · 2010
  3. Luthi v. EvansCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API