Legal Opinion

Mingus v. Kadane

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 17, 1939No. 13867PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DUNKLIN, Chief Justice.

This is a scire facias proceeding, • instituted by J. W. Mingus and wife against G. E. Kadane, to revive a judgment rendered against him. The defense of ten years limitation pleaded by the defendant, was sustained. *

Plaintiffs have appealed from that ruling, and the merits of that defense is the only question involved here. The trial was. upon an agreed statement which shows the. following:

The judgment which plaintiffs prayed be-revived was recovered by Charles O. Austin, as Commissioner of Banking, in the State of Texas, against G. E. Kadane, on June 13th, 1925, for…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Wilcox v. First National BankTexas Supreme Court · 1900
  2. Stevens v. StoneTexas Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Koenig v. MartiCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1937
  4. P. J. Willis & Brother v. StroudTexas Supreme Court · 1887
  5. Dewitt v. JonesTexas Supreme Court · 1856

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Zummo Packing Co. v. CothamCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1939
  2. Gartin v. FurgesonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1940
  3. In re KirbyDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1943
  4. Opinion No., Texas Attorney General Reports1982
  5. Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion, Texas Attorney General Reports1982

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API