Mingus v. Kadane
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
DUNKLIN, Chief Justice.
This is a scire facias proceeding, • instituted by J. W. Mingus and wife against G. E. Kadane, to revive a judgment rendered against him. The defense of ten years limitation pleaded by the defendant, was sustained. *
Plaintiffs have appealed from that ruling, and the merits of that defense is the only question involved here. The trial was. upon an agreed statement which shows the. following:
The judgment which plaintiffs prayed be-revived was recovered by Charles O. Austin, as Commissioner of Banking, in the State of Texas, against G. E. Kadane, on June 13th, 1925, for…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Wilcox v. First National BankTexas Supreme Court · 1900
- Stevens v. StoneTexas Supreme Court · 1901
- Koenig v. MartiCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1937
- P. J. Willis & Brother v. StroudTexas Supreme Court · 1887
- Dewitt v. JonesTexas Supreme Court · 1856
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Zummo Packing Co. v. CothamCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1939
- Gartin v. FurgesonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1940
- In re KirbyDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1943
- Opinion No., Texas Attorney General Reports1982
- Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion, Texas Attorney General Reports1982
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.