Legal Opinion
State v. Chiappetta
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided February 28, 2005No. 2 CA-CR 2001-0433PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
107 P.3d 366 (2005)
210 Ariz. 40
The STATE of Arizona, Appellee,
v.
Joseph Louis CHIAPPETTA, Appellant.
No. 2 CA-CR 2001-0433.
Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 2, Department B.
February 28, 2005.
Terry Goddard, Arizona Attorney General, By Randall M. Howe and Diane M. Acosta, Tucson, for Appellee.
Susan A. Kettlewell, Pima County Public Defender, By Lisa M. Hise, Tucson, for Appellant.
OPINION
ESPINOSA, J.
¶ 1 A jury found appellant Joseph Chiappetta guilty of fraudulent scheme and artifice, a class two felony; taking the identity of another, a class five felony; two counts of forgery, class four…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Almendarez-Torres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Liteky v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Edmonds v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2005
- Grohs v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2005
- Greist v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2005
- State of Arizona v. Matthew Erich ManzanedoCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2005
- State of Arizona v. Matthew Erich ManzanedoCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2005
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.