Legal Opinion

Barker v. Jones

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided June 5, 1883PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Bill in Equity, for partition. Facts found by a referee.

1Opinion of the CourtDoe, C. J.

It is agreed that one fifth of the title passed to the plaintiff by estoppel. Robertson v. Wilson, 38 N. H. 48. And he is entitled to partition without entry, actual possession, or judgment in a writ of entry, and notwithstanding the defendant’s actual and exclusive possession. The plaintiff’s title and right of possession are sufficient for the maintenance of this action without a technical seizin not included in his title and right. In this state the ancient doctrine of entry and seizin is largely obsolete. The plaintiff claims another fifth under a levy of an execution on a mortgagor’s…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Fletcher v. ChamberlinSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1881

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Robbins v. Ducey A.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API